Syntax highlighters... again
Posted July 2016
Code
It looks pretty when it’s right, doesn’t it? Quite hard to say what that is sometimes, and in my experience working with a lot of developers over the years, it’s pretty subjective too.
This blog
The current version of this blog now uses Hakyll, which uses Kate’s highlighting… but I found the default styling somewhat lacking especially for Python.
However a static blog with in-browser highlighting (à la prettify.js or highlight.js) seemed a shame
Customising Kate
The default styling doesn’t play nicely with Foundation (v6, at least) so a little hacking was necessary:
pre.sourceCode {
border: 1px;
background-color: hsl(0, 0, 96);
border-radius: 0.25rem;
padding: 0.25rem 0.5rem;
margin-bottom: 1rem;
}
pre.sourceCode * {
font-family: 'Inconsolata', sans-serif;
font-weight: 400;
border: none;
background: inherit;
}I also ended up “adding” a few more colours / styling with Python as a benchmark, as it was looking decidedly monochrome for a while.
Testing it out
Some random snippets across languages.
Haskell
fac n = foldr (*) 1 [1..n]
match "pages/*" $ do
route $ composeRoutes (dropPrefix "pages/") directoryify
compile $ pandocCompiler
>>= loadAndApplyTemplate "templates/default.html" defaultContext
>>= relativizeUrlsPython
import site
print "\n".join(site.getsitepackages())
def foo(bar=False):
rgx = re.compile(r'(\s+[a-z0-9]*)$')
return map(lambda x: rgx.str(x), [bar])Shell
$ xargs -I@ find @/quodlibet/ext/ -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -exec basename {} \; -o -regex '.*[a-z]\.py' -exec basename {} \; | sort Not beautiful, but could be worse!