Quod Libet development
Being a audio-obsessive can make life a bit difficult. Whilst iTunes is great for a lot of people, being closed-source and without a linux version, it’s already a fail for others. Whilst improving it’s also sorely lacking in several areas including performance and tagging. But this isn’t a post about iTunes…
enter QL…
For some years I’ve been a fan of Quod Libet, a lesser-known open-source music player and manager, based on Python and GStreamer for Linux and Windows (Mac builds are possible, allegedly). It’s fast, very powerful, has lots of plugins, and most importantly just does The Right Thing almost every time, whether it’s support for localisation, editing multiple songs, configurable views, smart playlists, volume correction, and so on.
development
It’s not until some time later (early 2010 I think) that I tentatively submitted my first patch to improve the ReplayGain support and configurability, a subject close to my heart and anyone that’s put on a diverse playlist and wondered why despite best efforts some songs are still louder than others.
Since then I’ve become a semi-regular commiter to the project on which I’ve spent a surprising amount of free time (not least because Python is not my first language). The focus has mainly been on new or improved plugins, but some core bugfixes and a little (dodgy) translation too, as well as taming the ever-growing issue triage and feature requests list.
that open-source thang
It has been very satisfying to finally contribute to the open source community, and to a upcoming project used daily by thousands (here are some usage stats for Debian alone), and the GTK and desktop app Python experience is great.
nick wrote 281 words on Sept. 17, 2011 at 1:54 p.m.

41 comments.
Cheap perfumes slups wrote: March 26, 2012, 1:55 p.m. soaraKablof wrote: April 5, 2012, 8:57 a.m. Brieregar wrote: April 5, 2012, 10:40 a.m. ciprofloxacin without prescription wrote: April 7, 2012, 7:55 p.m. sildenafil 50mg wrote: April 12, 2012, 11:24 p.m. champix coupons wrote: April 13, 2012, 11:01 p.m. generic sildenafil wrote: April 14, 2012, 8:34 a.m. antibiotics effects wrote: April 15, 2012, 2:47 p.m. accutane on line wrote: April 15, 2012, 10:55 p.m. watches replica Async wrote: April 16, 2012, 3:34 a.m. acyclovir 200 mg wrote: April 17, 2012, 10:46 a.m. tamoxifen dose wrote: April 17, 2012, 7:11 p.m. furosemide brand name wrote: April 18, 2012, 8:21 p.m. levofloxacin buy wrote: April 19, 2012, 3:48 p.m. replica handbags jaids wrote: April 23, 2012, 3:35 p.m. buy dapoxetine online wrote: April 25, 2012, 9:20 p.m. priligy review wrote: April 26, 2012, 9:46 p.m. suprax order wrote: April 27, 2012, 9:33 a.m. amoxicillin 500 mg wrote: April 27, 2012, 11:10 a.m. online kamagra wrote: April 27, 2012, 11:09 p.m. kamagra gel wrote: April 28, 2012, 6:58 p.m. google seo wrote: April 29, 2012, 1:50 p.m. misoprostol no prescription wrote: May 6, 2012, 3:11 a.m. buying amoxicillin wrote: May 7, 2012, 6:52 p.m. generic kamagra wrote: May 10, 2012, 5:14 p.m. Speattafelmk wrote: May 11, 2012, 10:19 a.m. phxdiyrx wrote: May 11, 2012, 1:27 p.m. kamagra jelly wrote: May 11, 2012, 2:41 p.m. Speattafelmk wrote: May 12, 2012, 6:43 a.m. aldara wrote: May 12, 2012, 5:35 p.m. amoxicillin to buy wrote: May 13, 2012, 11:30 a.m. how to buy antibiotics online wrote: May 13, 2012, 12:08 p.m. acheter cialis wrote: May 15, 2012, 6:43 p.m. Speattafelmk wrote: May 16, 2012, 1:24 a.m. online acyclovir wrote: May 16, 2012, 3:18 a.m. amoxicillin without prescription wrote: May 16, 2012, 3:24 a.m. Speattafelmk wrote: May 16, 2012, 3:26 p.m. kamagra on line wrote: May 17, 2012, 2:47 p.m. skjqtbjt wrote: May 17, 2012, 5:49 p.m. yasmin online wrote: May 17, 2012, 6:12 p.m. buy cheap kamagra wrote: May 18, 2012, 9:59 p.m.